Was a Lame Logo Behind the Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch Drama? |
Categories: Logo Design News
Written By: Nora Reed
If you have a TV, computer, cell phone, newspaper, eyes, ears, or any of the five senses at all, you know that both Merrill Lynch and Lehman Brothers experienced an interesting turn of events over the past weekend. In case you don’t, Lehman Brothers, one of the world’s four major banks filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. In the very same weekend, Merrill Lynch, another large player in the world banking market, was bought out by Bank of America.
While I’m no Allen Greenspan, I know this is bad. I cannot even pretend to understand how all of these events unfolded. But I do a have a theory. A design theory. Even though Merrill Lynch was bought out, at least they were bought. Lehman Brothers on the other hand was not.
In the frame of reference of my expertise, one reason for all this failure stands out. Logos. Take a look at these two logos and the companies they represent.
Please do not get me wrong, I understand the industry, culture, and history of these two companies. Bright, colorful, or light hearted logos wouldn’t fit. As a logo enthusiast, I personally have to give Lehman Brothers an F for effort. I am only jesting of course by implying that boredom leads to bankruptcy. That being said, from a strictly visual perspective, Merrill Lynch is the only company I would pay any money for too.
Think this is a one time coincidence? Take a look at two other firms who have been bought out or gone under…

Bought out by J.P. Morgan
Bailed out by the U.S. Government
Coincidence? I don’t think so. Any other companies you’ve seen that went under possibly because of their snore of a logo? All I know is it seems like there may be something deeper here than it would seem.





September 18th, 2008 at 5:43 pm
Nice theory…
How about looking at it from another perspective though. If we really want to connect a company logo to the company’s value and potential (theoretically, of course), then I’d rather put it this way:
The logo is not an essential factor in corporate rating, merely an indicator of the skills of the person who chose it, if we assume that a great design choice implies an overall better sense of business.
September 19th, 2008 at 5:39 am
That has to be the most unique analysis of the current financial crisis I have heard yet.
September 19th, 2008 at 1:23 pm
[...] September 19, 2008 at 2:23 pm · Filed under Branding, Graphic Design My student, Amanda sent me a really interesting blog post about the recent financial service firm failures and the poor design of logos [read the entire blog post here]. [...]
September 21st, 2008 at 4:41 am
I think you might be on to something here.
September 25th, 2008 at 12:34 pm
Hysterical. I actually laughed out loud.
Billion dollar firms (or at least used to be). You’d think they’d invest a couple thousand in to an interesting logo. Too busy being greedy i guess.