<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public Reaction against the London 2012 Olympic Logo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/</link>
	<description>Logo Design News &#38; Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:31:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ecula</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-179639</link>
		<dc:creator>Ecula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 04:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/#comment-179639</guid>
		<description>It sure is different. But I find it great being so. I am graphic designer myself. As I saw it, I was like ok... hmm... Actually it is OK! Not the same old.

And @Grace: &quot;...and also its not like the logo is going to go round killing people, because its so terrible looking...&quot; Haha. True.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sure is different. But I find it great being so. I am graphic designer myself. As I saw it, I was like ok&#8230; hmm&#8230; Actually it is OK! Not the same old.</p>
<p>And @Grace: &#8220;&#8230;and also its not like the logo is going to go round killing people, because its so terrible looking&#8230;&#8221; Haha. True.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borzo</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-179403</link>
		<dc:creator>Borzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/#comment-179403</guid>
		<description>Hello....It seems word ZiON can be read in the logo! If this was mere 2012 there shouldn&#039;t be any (dot) required, az for the presence of the (dot) it emphasizes more on word ZiON!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello&#8230;.It seems word ZiON can be read in the logo! If this was mere 2012 there shouldn&#8217;t be any (dot) required, az for the presence of the (dot) it emphasizes more on word ZiON!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gap&#8217;s new(?) logo &#124; Little Design Book</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-124909</link>
		<dc:creator>Gap&#8217;s new(?) logo &#124; Little Design Book</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/#comment-124909</guid>
		<description>[...] rebranding excercises often take a while to get accepted (sometimes) &#8212; everyone remembers the reactions to the 2010 London Olympics logo. But I simply do not understand at all why Gap would choose this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rebranding excercises often take a while to get accepted (sometimes) &#8212; everyone remembers the reactions to the 2010 London Olympics logo. But I simply do not understand at all why Gap would choose this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gap&#8217;s new(?) logo &#171; Little Design Book</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-115838</link>
		<dc:creator>Gap&#8217;s new(?) logo &#171; Little Design Book</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 11:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/#comment-115838</guid>
		<description>[...] and rebranding excercises often take a while to get accepted (sometimes); everyone remembers the reactions to the 2010 London Olympics logo. But I simply do not understand at all why Gap would choose this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and rebranding excercises often take a while to get accepted (sometimes); everyone remembers the reactions to the 2010 London Olympics logo. But I simply do not understand at all why Gap would choose this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grace</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-87330</link>
		<dc:creator>Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/#comment-87330</guid>
		<description>well i live in London, and yes i admit that the logo for 2012 isn&#039;t great. But you people need to get over it!. We are still in 2010, and your worrying about a logo for  the London Olympics which is in two frinken years, and also its not like the logo is going to go round killing people, because its so terrible looking.

Oh and you people from other country&#039;s committing on how hideous it is, and asking why there is a British flag and the Big Ben on it, well the reason why some of the logos has this on it, is because its the LONDON OLYMPICS 2010. Yes London, its not gonna have a Belgium or French flag on it. DERRRR!   
To all u foreigners out there moaning about the logo, its not gonna change! so get used to it!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well i live in London, and yes i admit that the logo for 2012 isn&#8217;t great. But you people need to get over it!. We are still in 2010, and your worrying about a logo for  the London Olympics which is in two frinken years, and also its not like the logo is going to go round killing people, because its so terrible looking.</p>
<p>Oh and you people from other country&#8217;s committing on how hideous it is, and asking why there is a British flag and the Big Ben on it, well the reason why some of the logos has this on it, is because its the LONDON OLYMPICS 2010. Yes London, its not gonna have a Belgium or French flag on it. DERRRR!<br />
To all u foreigners out there moaning about the logo, its not gonna change! so get used to it!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: London 2012 Olympics</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-76147</link>
		<dc:creator>London 2012 Olympics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/#comment-76147</guid>
		<description>I think the London 2012 logo is pretty effective, because it&#039;s so unconventional which gives it an edge. I can&#039;t wait for the Olympics, it&#039;ll mean a lot for London and be a huge move.

Maria</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the London 2012 logo is pretty effective, because it&#8217;s so unconventional which gives it an edge. I can&#8217;t wait for the Olympics, it&#8217;ll mean a lot for London and be a huge move.</p>
<p>Maria</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ram Bhandari</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-72132</link>
		<dc:creator>Ram Bhandari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/#comment-72132</guid>
		<description>It seems to be excellent, but the logo of 2012 logo reflects cracking structures. Does it mean constructing new generation for olympic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to be excellent, but the logo of 2012 logo reflects cracking structures. Does it mean constructing new generation for olympic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-69597</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/#comment-69597</guid>
		<description>I recently saw this logo and decided to look into it some more. I can tell you that at first sight, I did not recognize it as &quot;2012&quot;, it really just looks like trash to me. I&#039;m decently young and of the &quot;modern age&quot;, and this does not appeal to me in the slightest, it truly looks as if it just jumped out of the &#039;80&#039;s. For all of the money they spent on this design, I had hoped that it&#039;d be more attractive. I can&#039;t understand how they look at this and think &quot;based on our conception of advertising, this should go over well, therefore, we aren&#039;t changing it&quot; when it OBVIOUSLY hasn&#039;t been received very well at all. The colors are too close to neon, and the shapes too sharp and odd. Not to mention, it doesn&#039;t make me think of London at all.

As for the remark &quot;...this disgusting emblem was plainly ignored, how American of them,&quot; I thoroughly resent that. Americans haven&#039;t ignored very much, which is exactly why we&#039;re American and not English. I&#039;d suggest that you not be so ignorant of history, Gedimin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently saw this logo and decided to look into it some more. I can tell you that at first sight, I did not recognize it as &#8220;2012&#8243;, it really just looks like trash to me. I&#8217;m decently young and of the &#8220;modern age&#8221;, and this does not appeal to me in the slightest, it truly looks as if it just jumped out of the &#8217;80&#8242;s. For all of the money they spent on this design, I had hoped that it&#8217;d be more attractive. I can&#8217;t understand how they look at this and think &#8220;based on our conception of advertising, this should go over well, therefore, we aren&#8217;t changing it&#8221; when it OBVIOUSLY hasn&#8217;t been received very well at all. The colors are too close to neon, and the shapes too sharp and odd. Not to mention, it doesn&#8217;t make me think of London at all.</p>
<p>As for the remark &#8220;&#8230;this disgusting emblem was plainly ignored, how American of them,&#8221; I thoroughly resent that. Americans haven&#8217;t ignored very much, which is exactly why we&#8217;re American and not English. I&#8217;d suggest that you not be so ignorant of history, Gedimin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ehsan</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-55800</link>
		<dc:creator>Ehsan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/#comment-55800</guid>
		<description>i think that the logo looks ...well awful, for the amount of money that went into it they definately could have done better, and i mean what is up with the colours??? purple and yellow???????? its 2009 now and a logo like that is shameful, what must the countries think. I could have made that anyday, just give me &quot;paint&quot; and 1 hour... and no money at all and i could come up with something better. I think that the pictures above are far better and choosing that horrible coloured jagged logo will give london a bad name. I choose hope we have a good olypmics in London...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that the logo looks &#8230;well awful, for the amount of money that went into it they definately could have done better, and i mean what is up with the colours??? purple and yellow???????? its 2009 now and a logo like that is shameful, what must the countries think. I could have made that anyday, just give me &#8220;paint&#8221; and 1 hour&#8230; and no money at all and i could come up with something better. I think that the pictures above are far better and choosing that horrible coloured jagged logo will give london a bad name. I choose hope we have a good olypmics in London&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Seeker</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-37268</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Seeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 04:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/public-reaction-against-the-london-2012-olympic-logo/#comment-37268</guid>
		<description>This is a reply to Welshbabe4 &#039;s comments: And a regular, down to earth, common logo can&#039;t do that? for God&#039;s sake, there&#039;s no excuse, don&#039;t try to tell us this logo actually does magic that no other logo can do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a reply to Welshbabe4 &#8216;s comments: And a regular, down to earth, common logo can&#8217;t do that? for God&#8217;s sake, there&#8217;s no excuse, don&#8217;t try to tell us this logo actually does magic that no other logo can do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

