<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Museum gets &#8220;Satisfaction&#8221; with Rolling Stones logo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/museum-gets-satisfaction-with-rolling-stones-logo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/museum-gets-satisfaction-with-rolling-stones-logo/</link>
	<description>Logo Design News &#038; Tips</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Billigflug</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/museum-gets-satisfaction-with-rolling-stones-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-46763</link>
		<dc:creator>Billigflug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=210#comment-46763</guid>
		<description>The logo is great. Simple, unique and distinctiv. I'd expect it to be much more expensive. How about Coca Cola or Google, those logos should be quite expesive as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The logo is great. Simple, unique and distinctiv. I&#8217;d expect it to be much more expensive. How about Coca Cola or Google, those logos should be quite expesive as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stelth</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/museum-gets-satisfaction-with-rolling-stones-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-41150</link>
		<dc:creator>Stelth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=210#comment-41150</guid>
		<description>I hate it.  I've always thought it was disgusting, but Mick Jagger is disgusting so at least it isn't false advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate it.  I&#8217;ve always thought it was disgusting, but Mick Jagger is disgusting so at least it isn&#8217;t false advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
