<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Missile Defense Agency Logo &#8211; A new twist to the tale!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/missile-defense-agency-logo-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/missile-defense-agency-logo-controversy/</link>
	<description>Logo Design News &#38; Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:31:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/missile-defense-agency-logo-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-87436</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=3720#comment-87436</guid>
		<description>Nice Logo Design. ! A new twist is showing a blast after a missile fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Logo Design. ! A new twist is showing a blast after a missile fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Chamberlain</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/missile-defense-agency-logo-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-81245</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Chamberlain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 06:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=3720#comment-81245</guid>
		<description>This logo was actually designed during the Bush administration.  If you *must* see a message in it, it would be an American missile striking the heart of Islam, not the other way around.  That&#039;s assuming it&#039;s even supposed to be a crescent, at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This logo was actually designed during the Bush administration.  If you *must* see a message in it, it would be an American missile striking the heart of Islam, not the other way around.  That&#8217;s assuming it&#8217;s even supposed to be a crescent, at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/missile-defense-agency-logo-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-80738</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=3720#comment-80738</guid>
		<description>Smart, but I don&#039;t like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smart, but I don&#8217;t like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logo organismo de defesa antimÃ­ssil - uma nova reviravolta para o conto!</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/missile-defense-agency-logo-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-79931</link>
		<dc:creator>Logo organismo de defesa antimÃ­ssil - uma nova reviravolta para o conto!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=3720#comment-79931</guid>
		<description>[...] Embora recentemente aprovada logo para o S U. Departamento de Defesa de MÃ­sseis de Defesa Agency (MDA) ganhou crÃ­tica massiva dos bloggers para o seu projeto do logotipo peculiar, mas hoje eu trago-lhe um novo aspecto dessa disputa. A polÃªmica do projeto do logo que prejudicaram o MDA Ã© que ele apresenta [. . . ] URL do artigo original http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/missile-defense-agency-logo-controversy/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Embora recentemente aprovada logo para o S U. Departamento de Defesa de MÃ­sseis de Defesa Agency (MDA) ganhou crÃ­tica massiva dos bloggers para o seu projeto do logotipo peculiar, mas hoje eu trago-lhe um novo aspecto dessa disputa. A polÃªmica do projeto do logo que prejudicaram o MDA Ã© que ele apresenta [. . . ] URL do artigo original <a href="http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/missile-defense-agency-logo-controversy/" rel="nofollow">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/missile-defense-agency-logo-controversy/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: botelho</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/missile-defense-agency-logo-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-77362</link>
		<dc:creator>botelho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=3720#comment-77362</guid>
		<description>A very ordinary logo. Probably made by that nephew who messes with PC. I believe that the MDA could hire a real designer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very ordinary logo. Probably made by that nephew who messes with PC. I believe that the MDA could hire a real designer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logojin</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/missile-defense-agency-logo-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-77023</link>
		<dc:creator>logojin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=3720#comment-77023</guid>
		<description>yeah i am agree with logoziner, this is a clear example of logo plagiarism, both logos are much similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah i am agree with logoziner, this is a clear example of logo plagiarism, both logos are much similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logoziner</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/missile-defense-agency-logo-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-76808</link>
		<dc:creator>logoziner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 06:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=3720#comment-76808</guid>
		<description>No i am not agree with this!i am a designer and i know that arches and circles are very common symbols in a logo! just common circles and arches nothing else!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No i am not agree with this!i am a designer and i know that arches and circles are very common symbols in a logo! just common circles and arches nothing else!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logo Design</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/missile-defense-agency-logo-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-76742</link>
		<dc:creator>Logo Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=3720#comment-76742</guid>
		<description>Hi there, That&#039;s the nice thing you discovered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, That&#8217;s the nice thing you discovered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashely Adams : Sticker Printing</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/missile-defense-agency-logo-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-76737</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashely Adams : Sticker Printing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=3720#comment-76737</guid>
		<description>I do not find anything similar and controversial here! I do a lot of printing and designing work myself everyday and find these two logos different from each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not find anything similar and controversial here! I do a lot of printing and designing work myself everyday and find these two logos different from each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Amazing Spider-Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/missile-defense-agency-logo-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-76397</link>
		<dc:creator>The Amazing Spider-Ads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=3720#comment-76397</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t look particularly controversial to me, but it&#039;s sad that all the other logos it&#039;s accused of deriving from look much better (even the Iranian Space Agency logo)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t look particularly controversial to me, but it&#8217;s sad that all the other logos it&#8217;s accused of deriving from look much better (even the Iranian Space Agency logo)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

