<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple logo design folly â€“ Unreal news spreads confusion!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/apple-logo-design-folly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/apple-logo-design-folly/</link>
	<description>Logo Design News &#38; Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:31:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Essex SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/apple-logo-design-folly/comment-page-1/#comment-139623</link>
		<dc:creator>Essex SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=4569#comment-139623</guid>
		<description>I only recognised the 1997 logo and the 2006 logo.  It wouldn&#039;t make sense to me for apple to only use a leaf as their logo, wouldn&#039;t they be called leaf.

Fake or not , good or bad, I find it all a little amusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only recognised the 1997 logo and the 2006 logo.  It wouldn&#8217;t make sense to me for apple to only use a leaf as their logo, wouldn&#8217;t they be called leaf.</p>
<p>Fake or not , good or bad, I find it all a little amusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chase</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/apple-logo-design-folly/comment-page-1/#comment-97412</link>
		<dc:creator>Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 19:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=4569#comment-97412</guid>
		<description>@graham...technically, she gave you a plug. So...joke&#039;s on her if she was knocking imjustcreative.com. 

But seriously...I kind of like it. IT could be worse...like the 2011 Microsoft product logos:

http://lytl.me/VJKy3

Talk about hack job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@graham&#8230;technically, she gave you a plug. So&#8230;joke&#8217;s on her if she was knocking imjustcreative.com. </p>
<p>But seriously&#8230;I kind of like it. IT could be worse&#8230;like the 2011 Microsoft product logos:</p>
<p><a href="http://lytl.me/VJKy3" rel="nofollow">http://lytl.me/VJKy3</a></p>
<p>Talk about hack job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/apple-logo-design-folly/comment-page-1/#comment-94243</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 03:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=4569#comment-94243</guid>
		<description>Apple is getting free publicity for this fake logo design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is getting free publicity for this fake logo design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nora Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/apple-logo-design-folly/comment-page-1/#comment-93942</link>
		<dc:creator>Nora Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 04:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=4569#comment-93942</guid>
		<description>@Graham...Please, stop taking things personally? In no way, this post is any sort of &quot;attack&quot; on you. I merely cleared the misunderstanding created by your post about the Apple logo parody...that&#039;s all. 

Itâ€™s good to see that youâ€™ve added an update about the true story in your blog post. It will definitely clear the misunderstandings of misguided readers.

Being a prominent part of Logo Design Industry, I thought it was your responsibility to verify a news piece before publishing it on your blog. I am sure you now understand my point.

(If you read your comment above, I think its you who is making a personal attack...so chill dude :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Graham&#8230;Please, stop taking things personally? In no way, this post is any sort of &#8220;attack&#8221; on you. I merely cleared the misunderstanding created by your post about the Apple logo parody&#8230;that&#8217;s all. </p>
<p>Itâ€™s good to see that youâ€™ve added an update about the true story in your blog post. It will definitely clear the misunderstandings of misguided readers.</p>
<p>Being a prominent part of Logo Design Industry, I thought it was your responsibility to verify a news piece before publishing it on your blog. I am sure you now understand my point.</p>
<p>(If you read your comment above, I think its you who is making a personal attack&#8230;so chill dude <img src='http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devarts</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/apple-logo-design-folly/comment-page-1/#comment-93876</link>
		<dc:creator>devarts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=4569#comment-93876</guid>
		<description>i like design think dif . . awesome design</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like design think dif . . awesome design</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/apple-logo-design-folly/comment-page-1/#comment-93796</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 07:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=4569#comment-93796</guid>
		<description>Seriously. When are you going to stop with the &#039;attacks&#039; on me? It&#039;s getting rather tiresome. Do  you really want me to start spreading the facts about your real &#039;motives&#039; on Twitter?

Don&#039;t have proper verification? This is a parody, I don&#039;t need to have verification of this. If people then took the time to follow the links, they would then see it&#039;s a parody and not real. 

But if it makes you feel less angry about the Apple logo, then I have added a clear warning, that this is a parody and to be taken with a wry smile.

Nora, or whoever you really are, this is a weak attempt to continue your attacks on me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously. When are you going to stop with the &#8216;attacks&#8217; on me? It&#8217;s getting rather tiresome. Do  you really want me to start spreading the facts about your real &#8216;motives&#8217; on Twitter?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t have proper verification? This is a parody, I don&#8217;t need to have verification of this. If people then took the time to follow the links, they would then see it&#8217;s a parody and not real. </p>
<p>But if it makes you feel less angry about the Apple logo, then I have added a clear warning, that this is a parody and to be taken with a wry smile.</p>
<p>Nora, or whoever you really are, this is a weak attempt to continue your attacks on me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Essex</title>
		<link>http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/apple-logo-design-folly/comment-page-1/#comment-93636</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Essex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logoblog.org/wordpress/?p=4569#comment-93636</guid>
		<description>Well if they are a parody site, then, in my opinion, it would be fine. However, this news release doesn&#039;t seem like a parody to me. A parody, loosely defined, is an imitation with deliberate exaggeration for comical effect. I don&#039;t see anything humorous in that news release. I think they were trying to mislead people that Apple was changing its logo.

As for promoting fake news, or any news for that matter, without verification? that definitely is a no-no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if they are a parody site, then, in my opinion, it would be fine. However, this news release doesn&#8217;t seem like a parody to me. A parody, loosely defined, is an imitation with deliberate exaggeration for comical effect. I don&#8217;t see anything humorous in that news release. I think they were trying to mislead people that Apple was changing its logo.</p>
<p>As for promoting fake news, or any news for that matter, without verification? that definitely is a no-no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

