Comments on: Apple Fighting to Keep it’s Logo Identity

By: Shumyla

Shumyla — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:32:35 +0000

It should be “its logo identity” and not “it’s logo identity.” it’s = it is.

By: Jennifer johnson

Jennifer johnson — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:36:29 +0000

i think Woolworth deserves more to get this LOGO because it is more suitable for for it…Apple’s old design is quite simple but still it always leave a different impact..

By: Rich

Rich — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:40:09 +0000

the woolworths logo design is not confusingly similar so I think apple should let it be

By: chis design

chis design — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:43:52 +0000

I don’t agrre with it as according to this no one can use apple icon anywhere in future even for food products……….

By: chris design

chris design — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:41:47 +0000

I don’t think apple can trademark any fruit as for this apple fruit cannot be used anywhere in future even for food products also…..I don’t agree with it.

By: Altaf Shaikh

Altaf Shaikh — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:14:20 +0000

If people trademark of fruit, food, transport, bird, animal and what’s remain for other…???

By: Steve Tadlock

Steve Tadlock — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:00:37 +0000

Seems to me the intent of the law is so there would be no brand confusion on the part of the consumer. I don’t think there’s intent to confuse anything here. I love the Apple computer brand, but Woolworth’s is not a clear violation of that principle. It will be interesting to see how this turns out.

By: Michael Laskowski

Michael Laskowski — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:21:50 +0000

I think it’s Ok to use the fruit design as long as it does not look exactly like the Apple Company logo.

By: Mark

Mark — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 11:30:30 +0000

Living in Australia, I have to say it never occurred to me that the new Woolies logo looked like the Apple one. And I still don’t.

By: mark

mark — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:13:46 +0000

you can’t trademark a fruit.