BIG TEN Logo Redesign – From 11 to 12!!! |
Categories: hidden logos, logo design inspirations, Redesigned logos
Written By: Nora Reed
|
Renowned design agency Pentagram has unveiled yet another Big Ten hidden logo. The famous logo has been the identity carrier of Big Ten Conference, the oldest and largest Division I college athletic association in U.S. Michael Gericke (a graduate of the University of Wisconsin) and Michael Bierut are the chief architect behind the new logo for the conference. |
|
![]() |
|
The concept behind previous ‘11’:Initially, Big Ten represented ten of the leading teams in the country namely University of Michigan, University of Wisconsin-Madison, University of Iowa, Indiana University, Ohio State University, Michigan State University, University of Illinois, University of Minnesota, Northwestern University, and Purdue University. Another team was included in 1990 by the name of Pennsylvania State University. This formed the rationale behind the concealed “11” in the previous hidden logo. |
|
![]() |
|
Why go from 11 to 12?This year, there will be one more addition to the playing teams in 2011 namely University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Thus the need for a change in the identity was necessitated in order to create a more flexible and compatible logo design. |
|
|
Michael Gericke, co-designer of the logo, said: |
|
|
|
New BIG TEN Logo – Groundbreaking or ordinary?After finally having discarded the famous logo, BIG Ten decided to go simple with a “one-size-that-fits-all-approach”. About anyone can see the ‘10’ hidden within the word “BIG”. The concept is to enable the audience to read “Big Ten” in a single word “BIG. Another reason is to make it compatible for future uses in case other teams are added. But the confusion arrives when you look at the full version of the logo. It includes the word “TEN” stacked beneath “BIG”. I mean what is the point of “TEN” separately when you already have it in “BIG”? |
|
![]() |
|












December 20th, 2010 at 5:31 pm
As a penn state grad… and a logo exec… this is pretty weak. I would think they would try to sneak a “12″ in there somewhere, as they did with the old logo. GO PENN STATE!!
December 21st, 2010 at 6:19 am
But this goes to 11….Spinal Tap anyone?
December 22nd, 2010 at 6:41 pm
Is THAT the best they can do? Very disappointing. Unattractive. Ugly color. Shall I go on?
December 23rd, 2010 at 4:09 pm
I don’t know why the B.T. Conference didn’t open this naming
process to the public, it seems that is how you can eliminate all the negative reaction from all the fans and media alike. Well here goes….
The Big Ten – needs to change to….the MID – 12
with the new…. BLACK Division & BLUE Division
How long can we stay the BIG TEN with 12 schools…..?
I know that everyone will never be happy but if this has
anything to do with Higher Learning don’t you think we
should keep up the numbers (and times)….
Thank you again, and enjoy your holiday season,
Sincerely,
William Norton
December 26th, 2010 at 1:44 am
Yea that is pretty bad, old logo no pun intended 10X Better
December 27th, 2010 at 7:54 am
Looks very strong, love this design!
December 30th, 2010 at 11:25 am
I would have to say it is a pretty ordinary design. The ’11′ logo was groundbreaking, creative and cool. This one, not so much.
January 24th, 2011 at 6:26 pm
I really like the new logo. It’s bold, modern, cool, and has 2 words in 1. Nice!